Rx580 vs 1060

Rx580 vs 1060 DEFAULT

AMD Radeon RX vs Nvidia GeForce GTX

54 facts in comparison

AMD Radeon RX

Nvidia GeForce GTX

Why is AMD Radeon RX better than Nvidia GeForce GTX ?

  • TFLOPS higher floating-point performance?
    TFLOPSvs TFLOPS
  • GTexels/s higher texture rate?
    GTexels/svs GTexels/s
  • GB/s more memory bandwidth?
    GB/svsGB/s
  • GB more RAM memory?
    GBvs6GB
  • million more transistors?
    millionvs million
  • 64bit wider memory bus width?
    bitvsbit
  • more shading units?
    vs
  • 64 more texture mapping units (TMUs)?
    vs80

Why is Nvidia GeForce GTX better than AMD Radeon RX ?

  • MHz faster GPU clock speed?
    MHzvsMHz
  • GPixel/s higher pixel rate?
    GPixel/svs GPixel/s
  • 2MHz faster memory clock speed?
    MHzvsMHz
  • 30W lower TDP?
    WvsW
  • 8MHz higher effective memory clock speed?
    MHzvsMHz
  • MHz faster GPU turbo speed?
    MHzvsMHz
  • 16 more render output units (ROPs)?
    48vs32
  • Supports ray tracing?

General info

The thermal design power (TDP) is the maximum amount of power the cooling system needs to dissipate. A lower TDP typically means that it consumes less power.

A higher transistor count generally indicates a newer, more powerful processor.

Small semiconductors provide better performance and reduced power consumption. Chipsets with a higher number of transistors, semiconductor components of electronic devices, offer more computational power. A small form factor allows more transistors to fit on a chip, therefore increasing its performance.

Peripheral Component Interconnect Express (PCIe) is a high-speed interface standard for connecting components, such as graphics cards and SSDs, to a motherboard. Newer versions can support more bandwidth and deliver better performance.

The graphics card contains two graphics processing units (GPUs). This generally results in better performance than a similar, single-GPU graphics card.

6.warranty period

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX )

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX )

When covered under the manufacturer’s warranty it is possible to get a replacement in the case of a malfunction.

The graphics card uses a combination of water and air to reduce the temperature of the card. This allows it to be overclocked more, increasing performance.

The width represents the horizontal dimension of the product. We consider a smaller width better because it assures easy maneuverability.

The height represents the vertical dimension of the product. We consider a smaller height better because it assures easy maneuverability.

Performance

The graphics processing unit (GPU) has a higher clock speed.

The number of pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

The memory clock speed is one aspect that determines the memory bandwidth.

The number of textured pixels that can be rendered to the screen every second.

Shading units (or stream processors) are small processors within the graphics card that are responsible for processing different aspects of the image.

TMUs take textures and map them to the geometry of a 3D scene. More TMUs will typically mean that texture information is processed faster.

When the GPU is running below its limitations, it can boost to a higher clock speed in order to give increased performance.

The ROPs are responsible for some of the final steps of the rendering process, writing the final pixel data to memory and carrying out other tasks such as anti-aliasing to improve the look of graphics.

Memory

The effective memory clock speed is calculated from the size and data rate of the memory. Higher clock speeds can give increased performance in games and other apps.

Random-access memory (RAM) is a form of volatile memory used to store working data and machine code currently in use. It is a quick-access, temporary virtual storage that can be read and changed in any order, thus enabling fast data processing.

A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. It is an important factor of memory performance, and therefore the general performance of the graphics card.

Newer versions of GDDR memory offer improvements such as higher transfer rates that give increased performance.

Error-correcting code memory can detect and correct data corruption. It is used when is it essential to avoid corruption, such as scientific computing or when running a server.

Ports

Devices with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a display.

Newer versions of HDMI support higher bandwidth, which allows for higher resolutions and frame rates.

More HDMI ports mean that you can simultaneously connect numerous devices, such as video game consoles and set-top boxes.

Features

DirectX is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

OpenGL is used in games, with newer versions supporting better graphics.

Some apps use OpenCL to apply the power of the graphics processing unit (GPU) for non-graphical computing. Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance.

The graphics card supports multi-display technology. This allows you to configure multiple monitors in order to create a more immersive gaming experience, such as having a wider field of view.

5.load GPU temperature

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX )

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX )

A lower load temperature means that the card produces less heat and its cooling system performs better.

Ray tracing is an advanced light rendering technique that provides more realistic lighting, shadows, and reflections in games.

This benchmark measures the graphics performance of a video card. Source: PassMark.

This benchmark is designed to measure graphics performance. Source: AnandTech.

9.OpenGL ES version

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (AMD Radeon RX )

Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. (Nvidia GeForce GTX )

OpenGL ES is used for games on mobile devices such as smartphones. Newer versions support better graphics.

Which are the best graphics cards?

MSI GeForce RTX Suprim X

Gigabyte Aorus GeForce RTX Ti Xtreme

Gigabyte Aorus GeForce RTX Ti Master

Asus ROG Strix LC GeForce RTX Ti Gaming OC

Asus ROG Strix GeForce RTX Gamin OC

Asus ROG Strix GeForce RTX Ti Gaming OC

Gigabyte Aorus GeForce RTX Xtreme

Gigabyte Aorus GeForce RTX Master

Asus TUF GeForce RTX Ti Gaming OC

Gigabyte GeForce RTX Ti Vision OC

Show all
This page is currently only available in English.
Sours: https://versus.com/en/amd-radeon-rxvs-nvidia-geforce-gtx

GeForce GTX vs Radeon RX which is best for p gaming?

While high-end graphics cards like the AMD Radeon 7 and RTX Ti capture the lion's share of the headlines, most PC gaming is still done at good old-fashioned p. Here, you can spend just a few hundred bucks on a graphics card to get console-quality visuals at 60 frames per second, even in some of the most recent games. Two of the best graphics cards for p gaming are the focus of our article today: the AMD Radeon RX and the Nvidia GeForce GTX

These two mainstream GPUs are often close in terms of price, but which offers better performance? To find out, we'll show you how each of these cards perform in a selection of popular games, including Ghost Recon Wildlands, Rise of the Tomb Raider and The Witcher 3. While p performance will be the focus, we'll also look at how these cards can handle stretching to p. Before we get into the frame-rate charts, we'll take a brief look at how these two popular cards are different in terms of features and pricing. Let's get started.

Thinking about upgrading your gaming PC? Take a look at our recommendations for the best graphics cards on the market. Pairing your graphics card with one of the best gaming monitors is also important, so check out our latest picks!

While benchmarks are helpful, they're not the full story either. We'll also cover how the cards compare in terms of software and hardware features, plus what you can expect to pay for each of these two cards. Let's get started!

GTX__vs_RX_

GTX vs RX features

Before we get into the benchmarks, how do these cards compare in terms of features?

Well, both support the most important technologies: DirectX 12 and Vulkan graphics APIs, DisplayPort and HDMI b monitors and 4K / HDR content. That means you'll be able to play modern games and use recent monitors without worrying about compatibility issues.

As a member of Nvidia's Pascal generation, the GTX comes with a nice selection of modern features, including support for G-Sync monitors, Ansel game photography, Nvidia Shield streaming, ShadowPlay recording and so on. Nvidia have also recently added support for FreeSync monitors, allowing GTX owners to buy cheaper monitors without giving up variable refresh rate support - and if you're interested, we've recommended the best FreeSync monitors for Nvidia GPUs.

Meanwhile, the RX is part of the Polaris line of graphics cards, which has been since superceded by AMD's later Vega GPUs. However, Polaris still supports helpful features such as FreeSync monitor support, the AMD Link system monitoring mobile app, Eyefinity multi-display gaming and more.

Ultimately, it's hard to choose a winner here, as most features that appear on one card will appear on the other, often under a different name. Nvidia may have a few technologies that have yet to be matched by AMD, such as Ansel, but FreeSync monitors supported by the RX are significantly less expensive than the G-Sync alternatives supported by the GTX - so if you're planning on a new gaming monitor to go with your new graphics card, that should shift things rather radically in AMD's favour.

GTX vs RX prices and models

The GTX 6GB and RX 8GB occupy a similar mid-range space in the graphics card market, although the ongoing cryptocurrency bubble has meant that prices for both cards are likely to vary. Most of the time, we usually see the cheapest GTX 6GB models around $ (£) and the RX 8GB a little lower, normally around $ (£). You might also pick up a free game or two with your graphics card: At the time of writing, AMD are offering any two of The Division 2, Resident Evil 2 or Devil May Cry 5, while Nvidia are saving their promotions for the newer GTX and Ti, giving the overall lead to the AMD card.

Of course, prices can vary by manufacturer, clock speed, cooling solution, form factor and a laundry list of other characteristics. Searching for bargains, you may find prices substantially below those that we've quoted above - but be aware that you may be looking at a cut-down model with half of the usual assortment of VRAM, which works out as 3GB for the GTX and 4GB for the RX These budget cards are significantly worse in terms of performance, so we recommend sticking with the full-fat models. For an idea as to why, check out our 3GB vs 6GB GTX comparison. There's even a Chinese-only RX model that ships with fewer compute units, compared to the standard , which is similarly not worthwhile in our books.

Brands we recommend you look out for (in alphabetical order) include Asus, EVGA, Gigabyte, MSI and Zotac. Of course, this isn't an exhaustive list of manufacturers you should trust, and other brands can produce great cards too.

GTX vs RX benchmarks

For each benchmark, you'll see a YouTube video depicting the game in question and a special in-house benchmarking widget. Once you start the video, you can see in real time how each card handles the game. You can select and deselect different benchmarks as you please; you might want to see how the same card varies between p and p resolution, or see how both cards handle the same resolution. If you scroll down a little more, you can also find a handy graph of the results from the entire run, presented in barchart form. You can click on this to swap between frame-rate and percentage differentials, the latter of which may be more illuminating.

Our tests were conducted with a reference Nvidia GeForce GTX 6GB and a Sapphire Nitro AMD Radeon RX 8GB. It's worth noting that no reference model exists for the RX , so we went with what was (at the time of testing) the fastest RX available that we're aware of, to the point where stable overclocking only adds another 20MHz to the core (!). That means you should expect slightly worse performance from other RX models that operate at a lower clock speed; your mileage may vary.

Assassin's Creed Unity

We'll start off with Assassin's Creed Unity, which came out back in The bustling streets of Paris still prove a good test for most cards, and the results are quite similar indeed. The GTX seems to be a little more stable here, with less frame-rate variance and better fifth percentile results, although the RX does manage to score a better result on average for both resolutions we tested at.

AC Unity: Ultra High, FXAA

  • GTX
  • RX
  • GTX
  • RX

This content is hosted on an external platform, which will only display it if you accept targeting cookies. Please enable cookies to view.

Ashes of the Singularity

Ashes of the Singularity, a strategy game, features lots of robotic creations shooting RGB lasers at each other - just like the interior of most PC cases these days. The game includes a handy in-game benchmark targeted by both Nvidia and AMD, but Nvidia tend to fall behind at the final whistle. That's definitely the case here, with Team Green sitting behind by about four or five frames per second on average. Things are a little better when you look at the minimum frame-rate measurements, which shows just a two frame per second lead for AMD at p.

Ashes of the Singularity DX Extreme, No AA

  • GTX
  • RX
  • GTX
  • RX

This content is hosted on an external platform, which will only display it if you accept targeting cookies. Please enable cookies to view.

Battlefield 1

Battlefield 1 features a stunningly chaotic depiction of World War 1 combat, both in its trademark multiplayer and the story-based single-player campaign shown in our benchmark. AMD tend to do better in DirectX 12 benchmarks like this, and combined with the RX 's factory overclock we get a convincing 10 per cent performance advantage for the RX here. Note that the frame-time peaks here are quite random, based on the presence or absence of close-range explosions, so don't worry about them too much.

Battlefield 1 DX Ultra, TAA

  • GTX
  • RX
  • GTX
  • RX

This content is hosted on an external platform, which will only display it if you accept targeting cookies. Please enable cookies to view.

Crysis 3

Can it run Crysis? Yup, both of these cards can handle the release, Crysis 3, at a hearty 80 frames per second at p and 50 frames per second at p. However, running at 4K is out of the question - surprising for a game approaching its sixth birthday, but that's Crysis for you. Our usual highly explosive train ride shows very little to separate both cards, with the RX coming out just a little bit ahead on average thanks to a few extra dips for the GTX

Crysis 3: very high, SMAA T2X

  • GTX
  • RX
  • GTX
  • RX

This content is hosted on an external platform, which will only display it if you accept targeting cookies. Please enable cookies to view.

The Division

Nvidia's cards sometimes fall behind AMD in DirectX 12 games, and that's exactly what happens in our test of The Division. This title is playable on the GTX and averages over 60 frames per second at p, but the RX still commands a sizeable 10 per cent lead in this test. Ultimately though, both cards produce a reasonable result as long as you're willing to accept some cutbacks in terms of graphical fidelity.

The Division DX Ultra, TAA

  • GTX
  • RX
  • GTX
  • RX

This content is hosted on an external platform, which will only display it if you accept targeting cookies. Please enable cookies to view.

Far Cry Primal

Far Cry Primal is a tweener game, sitting between Far Cry 4 and Far Cry 5 and including some technical characteristics of both titles. This title offers some of the best results for Nvidia cards, with the GTX claiming an advantage at p over the card from Team Red. However, the two GPUs swap places in the more challenging p version of the test, continuing the trend we've seen thus far.

Far Cry Primal: Ultra, SMAA

  • GTX
  • RX
  • GTX 6GB
  • RX

This content is hosted on an external platform, which will only display it if you accept targeting cookies. Please enable cookies to view.

Ghost Recon Wildlands

Ghost Recon Wildlands is perhaps the most challenging game in our benchmark suite thanks to its extremely demanding ultra preset, but it doesn't seem to favour one card over the other - so you can expect very similar results at both resolutions. Nvidia take the p crown by a hair, perhaps thanks to AMD's greater driver overhead, and AMD return the favour at p where CPU utilisation is less important.

Ghost Recon Wildlands: Ultra, TAA

  • GTX
  • RX
  • GTX
  • RX

This content is hosted on an external platform, which will only display it if you accept targeting cookies. Please enable cookies to view.

Rise of the Tomb Raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider is another DirectX 12 benchmark, and we all know what that means: slightly better performance for AMD in a typical scenario! Once again, the trend plays out although the margins are closer than you might expect. Expect lower frame-rates but a similar trend in the newer Tomb Raider title, Shadow of the Tomb Raider.

Rise of the Tomb Raider DX Very High, SMAA

  • GTX
  • RX
  • GTX
  • RX

This content is hosted on an external platform, which will only display it if you accept targeting cookies. Please enable cookies to view.

The Witcher 3

We conclude our benchmark tour with one of the most popular RPGs in recent memory, The Witcher 3. Here we see our final win for AMD, as the RX manages to outdo the Nvidia GTX throughout the benchmark at both p and p.

The Witcher 3: Ultra, POST-AA, No Hairworks

  • GTX
  • RX
  • GTX
  • RX

This content is hosted on an external platform, which will only display it if you accept targeting cookies. Please enable cookies to view.

Wrapping up

So what do our benchmarks reveal? Well, clearly the RX is the better card in more of the games that we've tested, with the AMD card coming on top in seven of our nine tests at p, and every time at p. However, the GTX does keep it close in most games, usually within two or three frames per second at the lower resolution. Also bear in mind that we are running the fastest RX on the market here in the absence of a reference card.

Given its often lower price compared to the RX unit we tested, that suggests the GTX might be the better buy if you're gaming at p, but if you want to stretch to p, the AMD card is probably worth its extra cost. One thing we should point out is that our test system is a Core i7 K overclocked to GHz on all cores. AMD's driver overhead is significantly higher under DX11, so some of these results may change if you're running an older, or slower processor. We know there's still a lot of vintage Core i5 Ks out there! On those older systems, Nvidia is the smarter choice.

However, the GTX and RX are so close in most titles that it makes it hard to definitely recommend one over the other, particularly given the recent variations we've seen in graphics card prices. Therefore, we recommend you look at the benchmark results above to see how the cards handle your favourite games, decide which features are the most important to you and check the current price of each card before committing to either.


Now that you've seen the benchmarks for one card, why not check out see which PC hardware we recommend to our friends and family? Here are the DF picks for the overall best graphics cards and for the best gaming monitors on the market.


We hope this comparison was useful. For further reading, why not have a look at our reviews of each card via the links below?

Thanks for checking out the article and we'll catch you on the next one.

Sours: https://www.eurogamer.net/
  1. Nik public safety
  2. Brian brown nom
  3. Nashua humane society

Radeon RX vs. GeForce GTX Which Was the Better Investment?

Today we’ve revisiting the age old battle between the Radeon RX and GeForce GTX , though this battle really began for AMD with the Radeon RX This GPU was released in June , nearly four years ago which is crazy in GPU years and more so considering this part is technically still on sale today and is sold in fairly large quantities.

The Radeon RX was originally intended to do battle with Nvidia’s upcoming Pascal-based GTX , released only a month later. At the time, the 8GB RX was priced at $ and the GTX 6GB was sold for $ Three months after release we compared the two, head to head in 22 games and found on average that the GeForce GPU was 6% faster. We noted then that in more recent titles, based on modern DX12 and Vulkan APIs, the RX was almost always faster. Half a dozen of the titles tested supported a modern API and when comparing the data from those select titles, the GTX 6GB was actually 5% slower on average. It seemed like over time, the Radeon RX would end up being the faster product, while the GTX was more efficient and therefore AIB models generally ran cooler and quieter.

We've revisited the same comparison a few times over the years. In , AMD released new drivers claiming big performance upgrades and with 19 games tested in total we found the GTX 6GB was now just 1% faster on average.

A year after launching the RX , AMD refreshed it as the RX with a mild overclock and a price cut. To combat this Nvidia released a 9 Gbps memory version of the GTX which improved memory bandwidth by 13% over the standard 8 Gbps models. That sounded reasonably substantial, but without increasing the core clock frequency this change had little impact on performance.

By mid on a 27 game benchmark, the Radeon RX was already 3% faster than the GTX 9Gbps model. The tables had turned you could say, though it was fair to say performance was a match between the two and the ultimate choice came down to which games you played the most. A year later in we revisited this battle once again with 25 games, many of them new and previously untested for this comparison. This time the GTX was found to be on top by a marginal 3% faster on average result.

Then the most recent update was published in with our biggest sample of games yet at This time the RX was around 3% faster than the GTX What's perhaps most surprising, the RX is still on sale and remains one of the best value sub-$ graphics card on the market. Easily beating out the newer XT and matching the GTX Super. It’s possible to buy an 8GB RX for as little as $ and that makes this ancient GPU better value than most of the latest offerings.

Today's comparisong is a big 32 game benchmark, as usual we'll go over the results for about a dozen of the newer titles and then we’ll check out some head to head comparisons with all games in a few performance breakdown graphs. Our test rig consisted of a Core iK clocked at 5 GHz with 32GB of DDR memory. Representing the green team is the Gigabyte Aorus GTX 6G 9Gbps and for the red team the Gigabyte Aorus RX XTR 8G. The latest available display drivers at the time of testing we’re used and all results have been updated. Let’s get to the good stuff…

Benchmarks

First up we have Rainbow Six Siege using its new Vulkan implementation. Previously using DX11, the RX was around 15% faster than the GTX However, we’re now looking at around twice that margin as the RX was 27% faster at p and 30% faster at p.

Clearly Nvidia hasn’t bothered to optimize their drivers for Pascal GPUs using the newer API in this title.

World War Z is another title that makes use of Vulkan and here the RX is seen to be 23% faster at p and 27% faster at p, so another massive win for the red team.

Resident Evil 2 is yet another title that makes use of a low-level API and here the RX comfortably beats the by a 23% margin at p and a 24% margin at p.

Red Dead Redemption 2 requires at least 8GB of VRAM when using high quality settings and as a result, we see rather poor 1% low performance from the GTX due to its 6GB buffer.

So while the RX was 18% faster when comparing average frame rate performance at p, it was a whopping 77% faster when comparing the 1% low data, and more crucially, didn’t suffer from frame stuttering.

Apex Legends uses a modified version of Valve's Source engine and we had previously found the RX to have a large performance advantage in this title. However, after the most recent update performance has swung around in Nvidia’s favor, and for now at least, the GTX is up to 12% faster.

PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds uses the Unreal Engine 4 which is optimized for Nvidia hardware and as such the GTX beats the RX by a handy margin in this title, offering 14% more frames at p and 10% more at p.

Interestingly, although Fortnite also uses the Unreal Engine 4, AMD has been able to optimize the RX for better performance. We know AMD was focused for a while on improving performance for this super popular title, and it seems they’ve done just that as the RX was faster at both tested resolutions by up to a 12% margin.

Performance in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is neck and neck, no real winner here.

Interestingly despite being an Nvidia sponsored title, Metro Exodus plays much better on the RX , though it does also use the DX12 API. Here the Radeon GPU was 23% faster at p and 21% faster at p.

Performance in the newly released Star Wars: Jedi Fallen Order is very similar and this is a DirectX 11 title using the highly popular Unreal Engine.

Last year when testing F1 the RX and GTX were ever so close. However, this latest version, F1 makes use of DX12 and here the Radeon GPU has a huge performance advantage that sees it deliver 21% more frames at p and 23% more at p.

Performance in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare is fairly even, though the RX was 6% faster at p and 9% faster at p. Not a huge difference, though you will notice the performance boost at p in particular.

Performance Breakdown

The Radeon RX looked somewhat dominant in that 12 game sample, but we tested many more games

Let’s see how the and stack up across 32 new and popular titles.

At p the RX was 5% faster on average and looking at the results overall, you have a much better chance of receiving an extra 10% or more performance with the Radeon GPU in modern titles. Many of the newly released titles where the RX didn’t look so great use the Unreal Engine such as The Outer Worlds and PUBG, for example.

Of the 32 games tested, 10 of them saw margins within 5%, which we'd consider a tie. There were 16 games where the RX was faster by a 6% margin or greater and just 6 games where it was slower by a 6% margin or greater. The RX is clearly the more consistent performer in

The margins grow in AMD’s favor at p. Here the RX was 8% faster on average, it’s biggest win over the GTX since this battle started. It would seem as though the extra 2GB of VRAM is now coming into play and we certainly saw this in titles such as Red Dead Redemption 2, for example.

Long Term Bets

Roughly four years after putting together our first big benchmark comparison between these two GPUs, it seems many of our original thoughts were accurate. We suspected that due to the strong initial low-level API performance of the RX , the Radeon would eventually end up becoming the superior GPU. We didn’t recommend buying the RX on that hunch alone though, as it was impossible to know just how long it would be before the superior DX12 and Vulkan performance would pay off.

While the RX has clearly aged better, the GTX 6GB hasn’t turned out to be a poor choice after all these years either. Current owners of the GTX 6GB may still be content about their investment. In some titles the RX delivers in excess of 20% more frames, but overall performance is still good. For the most part the 6GB frame buffer is fine and you can easily work around that limitation.

Had you planned to keep the Radeon RX for many years, then the better low-level API support would have been a major consideration, but if you upgrade every 2 or 3 years, then probably not as much. Since the RX was released and then refreshed as the RX , there’s been no obvious alternative in the $ to $ price range.

Nvidia's attempt with the GTX a year ago was welcome, but offering just 15% more performance didn’t make the $ upgrade worth it, plus AMD kept cutting RX 's prices in retaliation.

Right now, for $$, Radeon RX graphics cards offer good value but for the same price we'd prefer the newer GeForce GTX Super. Both GPUs are mostly matched on performance, with the GeForce getting the upper hand on efficiency and thermals.

If you want to spend over $ on a new graphics card today, go with the $ GeForce GTX Super which offers ~30% more performance, or $ on a GeForce RTX for a little over 50% more performance.

Shopping Shortcuts:
  • GeForce GTX Super on Amazon
  • GeForce GTX Super on Amazon
  • GeForce RTX on Amazon
  • GeForce RTX Super on Amazon
  • AMD Radeon RX on Amazon
  • AMD Radeon RX on Amazon
  • AMD Radeon RX on Amazon
  • GeForce RTX Super on Amazon

interactions

Sours: https://www.techspot.com/review/geforcevs-radeon/

AMD Radeon RX
vs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 6GB

The GTX might be the mid-range flagship of the latest Pascal set of graphics cards, but their prices keep them out of the reach of most entry-level PC gamers. On the other hand, the GTX 6GB is closer to being reasonably affordable at a price tag of $ NVIDIA ’s xx60 cards have always been defined by entry-level prices with performance that knocks on the door of mid-range graphics cards – especially when overclocked. After taking the time to fully test the Pascal graphics card inside the GTX 6GB, we can say without a doubt that it continues the trend.

The GTX 6GB is much more expensive than the GTX as it costs a whopping $ Compare this to the GTX , which came originally at a price of $ Meanwhile, the AMD closest equivalent card is the RX which costs $ Spec for spec, this GTX 6GB leapfrogs its direct predecessor, the GTX , by boasting 2 % more fps.

The GTX 6GB has 6 GB RAM compared to the GTX 's 2 GB video memory. In our synthetic benchmarks, the GTX 6GB blows past the GTX and, amazingly, even the GTX as well.

Fortunately, gaming performance was quite impressive. The GTX 6GB consistently delivers great frame rate increases over the GTX and it really justifies an upgrade. For p Full HD, we were able to play Hitman 2, Apex Legends, F1 , World War Z, Battlefield V at 61 fps to 68 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 65 fps.

For p Quad HD, we were able to play Valorant at fps to fps and kept frame rates hovering around fps. For p 4K, we were able to play Valorant at 91 fps to 91 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 91 fps.

Sours: https://www.gpucheck.com/compare/amd-radeon-rxvs-nvidia-geforce-gtx/intel-core-ikghz-vs-intel-core-ikghz/

1060 rx580 vs

Another twenty minutes they made her understand that everything was ready and moved the mirror. In the mirror there was a beautiful brown-haired woman with nice hair and makeup. The straps of the dress were of black lace and felt on the back, half of the back of the dress.

Was also of lace. Masha did not understand anything in French, but pointing with her finger she asked to look in a large mirror.

Czy warto kupić używane GTX 1060 i RX 580 w 2021 roku? / TEST

Left alone on the ground and exhausted, covered in sperm, she sent all the photos in one file via WhatsApp to my phone. I was sitting in a chair when. The phone vibrated. Opening the vatsap, I looked through all the photos sent by my wife with bated breath.

You will also like:

And she managed to shove it all. Here is a smart girl, dear, he said and finished in her mouth. Katya swallowed the male sperm and winced slightly.



1004 1005 1006 1007 1008