Ryzen vs 6700k

Ryzen vs 6700k DEFAULT
Age
Newest74 Months55 MonthsMore recent.
+26% TDP
Thermal Design Power (TDP)91 Watts+4%95 Watts Cores
CPU Processing Cores4 cores8 coresHugely higher core count.
+100% Threads
CPU Processing Threads8 threads16 threadsHugely higher thread count.
+100% Lithography
Manufacturing process14 nm14 nm Base Clock
Base Clock Speed4 GHzFaster base frequency.
+18%3.4 GHz Turbo Clock
Turbo Clock Speed4.2 GHzFaster turbo frequency.
+11%3.8 GHz 64-Core
OC Multi Core Mixed Speed741 Pts1282 PtsMuch faster OC 64-core speed.
+73% 64-Core
Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed632 Pts1138 PtsHugely faster 64-core speed.
+80%
Sours: https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-6700K-vs-AMD-Ryzen-7-1700X/3502vs3915

Intel Core i7-6700K vs. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

Show all Cinebench R23 (Single-Core) results




Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Show all Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core) results




Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

Show all Cinebench R20 (Single-Core) results




Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Show all Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core) results




Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

Show all Cinebench R15 (Single-Core) results




Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Show all Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core) results




Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

Show all Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core) results




Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Show all Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core) results




Monero Hashrate kH/s

The crypto currency Monero has been using the RandomX algorithm since November 2019. This PoW (proof of work) algorithm can only efficiently be calculated using a processor (CPU) or a graphics card (GPU). The CryptoNight algorithm was used for Monero until November 2019, but it could be calculated using ASICs. RandomX benefits from a high number of CPU cores, cache and a fast connection of the memory via as many memory channels as possible. Tested with XMRig v6.x under the operation system HiveOS.

Show all Monero Hashrate kH/s results




iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

Show all iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS) results




Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.

Show all Blender 2.81 (bmw27) results




Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

Show all Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core) results




Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Show all Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core) results




Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

Show all Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core) results




Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Show all Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core) results




Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.

Show all Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL) results




Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Show all Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark results




Popular comparisons containing this CPUs



back to index
Facebook
Twitter


Sours: https://www.cpu-monkey.com/en/compare_cpu-intel_core_i7_6700k-518-vs-amd_ryzen_7_3700x-929
  1. Craigslist sacramento community
  2. Psalms 18 37
  3. Color guard gifs
  4. Mck accessory kit

The 3700X is a $320 USD 8-core, 16-thread mid-range Ryzen 3000 series CPU. Out of the box, the 3700X, 3600X and 3600 achieve similar quad core speeds but the 16 threaded 3700X is 30% faster at multi-core computations than the 12 threaded 3600X. Comparing the 3700X to Intel’s i7-9700K shows that, when overclocked, the 3700X is 26% faster at 64-core computations but 13% slower for gaming and desktop (sub eight core performance). Unlike lower end Ryzen 3000 SKUs, the 3700X comes with a half decent cooler but AMD should not have bothered since a $20 aftermarket cooler is still quieter, easier to change, and better at cooling. With a Gammaxx 400 cooler we were able to maintain a 43.25x OC during our EFps tests. We had to use a fixed clock OC (rather than Offset/PBO) to avoid significant frame drops in Fortnite. With strong single-core scores, the 3700X should offer very strong gaming performance but in reality it is let down by its memory controller, which, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency. The heavily hyped 3700X, paired with a 2060S, offers real world gaming performance comparable to the $80 USD entry level 4-core, 4-thread Intel Core i3-9100F. At $320 USD, the 3700X offers reasonable value to full time media encoders but general desktop users, gamers and even streamers should look elsewhere. Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames. The 3700X severely bottlenecks a 2070S: gamers should investigate the 9600K, which is both cheaper and faster. [Jul '19CPUPro]

MORE DETAILS

Sours: https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-6700K-vs-AMD-Ryzen-7-3700X/3502vs4043

i7-6700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 - Just Cause 4 GTX 1660 - Game Performance Benchmarks


i7-6700KRyzen 5 3600

Multi-Thread Performance

Single-Thread Performance

Just Cause 4

i7-6700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 in Just Cause 4 using GTX 1660 - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i7-6700KRyzen 5 3600


Ultra Quality
ResolutionFrames Per Second
1080p
1080p
1440p
1440p
2160p
2160p
w1440p
w1440p
High Quality
ResolutionFrames Per Second
1080p
1080p
1440p
1440p
2160p
2160p
w1440p
w1440p
Medium Quality
ResolutionFrames Per Second
1080p
1080p
1440p
1440p
2160p
2160p
w1440p
w1440p
Low Quality
ResolutionFrames Per Second
1080p
1080p
1440p
1440p
2160p
2160p
w1440p
w1440p
i7-6700K
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
Ryzen 5 3600
  • The Ryzen 5 3600 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Ryzen 5 3600 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The Ryzen 5 3600 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The Ryzen 5 3600 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The Ryzen 5 3600 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The Ryzen 5 3600 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i7-6700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 specifications

i7-6700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Architecture

i7-6700KRyzen 5 3600
CodenameSkylakeZen 2
GenerationCore i7 (Skylake)Ryzen 5 (Zen 2)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4
Part#SR2L0unknown
Production StatusActiveActive
ReleasedAug 2015Jul 2019

i7-6700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Cache

i7-6700KRyzen 5 3600
Cache L164K (per core)96K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L38MB (shared)32MB (shared)

i7-6700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Cores

i7-6700KRyzen 5 3600
# of Cores46
# of Threads812
Integrated GraphicsHD Graphics 530N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i7-6700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Features

i7-6700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance

i7-6700KRyzen 5 3600
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency4 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplier40.0x36.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP95 W65 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.2 GHzup to 4.2 GHz
Voltageunknownvariable

i7-6700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Physical

i7-6700KRyzen 5 3600
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelTSMC
Package
Process Size14 nm7 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151AMD Socket AM4
Transistorsunknown4,800 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Share Your Comments 94

Compare i7-6700K vs Ryzen 5 3600 in more games

Sours: https://www.gpucheck.com/compare-game-cpu/just-cause-4/intel-core-i7-6700k-4-00ghz-vs-amd-ryzen-5-3600

Vs 6700k ryzen

Intel Core i7-6700K vs AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating10.2025.95
Novelty1 August 20157 July 2019
Cost$339$329
Boost clock speed42004400
Base clock speed40003600
Chip lithography147
Thermal design power (TDP)9565

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-6700K and Ryzen 7 3700X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Sours: https://technical.city/en/cpu/Core-i7-6700K-vs-Ryzen-7-3700X
Ryzen 9 3900X vs i7 6700K Benchmarks - Test Review - Comparison - Gaming - 13 Tests

I am in his power. I obediently stand with cancer and give it in the ass. I'm his whore. I relaxed even more, I watched my feelings. He began to cum, and I felt his cock contract in my anus.

Now discussing:

You know, usually I write the script. she whispered. But you don't resist, then you don't mind. I grinned.



2216 2217 2218 2219 2220