The bots wiki

The bots wiki DEFAULT

Battle of the Bots

When Wedge rashly challenges Hot Shot to a one-on-one challenge, he worries that he doesn't have the skills to win.


Wedge shows off his Heroes of Cybertron trading cards. As he's warning the others that some of the cards are delicate, Hot Shot flies in and accidentally scatters the pile of cards with his jet mode. The recruits dream of getting their own cards, and when Hot Shot says he'll try anything, even construction, to do so, Wedge ends up challenging him to a contest with one construction and one Cube challenge. Hoist volunteers Hot Shot's Cube trophy as the prize, and Hot Shot agrees, confident he'll win. Wedge is soon similarly agreeing to putting up his Heroes of Cybertron card collection as a prize.

They set up for the first construction challenge, with Whirl and Medix providing commentary and Hoist acting as referee. Whirl and Medix don't fancy Hot Shot's chances. Indeed, Wedge easily wins round one, swiftly constructing a wall, however Hot Shot manages to tie the score by using his water blasters to dig the required hole for round two. As they start the last task, knocking the wall down to fill in the hole, Wedge has a strong start until Hot Shot uses his afterburners to completely demolish his wall. Hot Shot is declared winner of the construction challenge and Wedge is demoralized. Though he believes he has no chance of winning the Cube round, Hot Shot talks him into persevering.

As they start the Cube challenge, Whirl goes over the rules. Hot Shot scores the first point, and though Wedge obviously can't jump around, he manages to score using his power drivers. They both score another point apiece, but it still looks like the more agile Hot Shot is going to win, until Wedge transforms and catches the cube in his scoop. Hot Shot points out that if Wedge hadn't tried, he'd never have known he could win. They agree to leave the competition at a tie. Hot Shot returns Wedge's card collection, and Hoist reveals he's made custom trading cards of the two competitors.

Featured characters

(Numbers indicate order of appearance.)


"And the winner gets a golden trash can!"
"Uh, that's actually my trophy for being last year's King of Cube, but hey, why not?"

Hoist and Hot Shot work out prizes.


Continuity notes


Transformers references

  • Searchlight's ten thousand watt lights and Metroplex's seventy thousand ton lift ability are callbacks to their original Generation 1 packaging bios.

Real-world references

Animation and technical errors


  • Just in case you were wondering, the Cybertronian text on Hot Shot's King of Cube trophy unsurprisingly reads "King of Cube".

Foreign localization


  • Title: "La bataille des robots" ("Battle of the robots")
  • Original airdate: ?

Home video releases

Thanks for helping me... pull myself together.

This cartoon episode article is a stub and is missing information.
You can help Transformers Wiki by expanding it.


The Boys Wiki

The Boys is an Amazon Original series returning to Prime Video for a second run on September 4, 2020.

An irreverent take on the superhero genre, it explores what happens when superheroes abuse their powers instead of using them for good. These mighty beings — who are popular as celebrities, as influential as politicians, and as revered as gods — find themselves hunted by a non-powered group of vigilantes.

Starring Karl Urban, Jack Quaid, Antony Starr, Erin Moriarty, Dominique McElligott, Jessie T. Usher, Laz Alonso, Chace Crawford, Tomer Capon, Karen Fukuhara, Nathan Mitchell, and Elisabeth Shue, the series was created by Garth Ennis, author of the original comic, and was adapted by Evan Goldberg, Eric Kripke and Seth Rogen.

  1. Best buy appleton
  2. Tropico 6 reddit
  3. Voice coaches 2019

Internet bot

For other uses, see Automated bot.

For bot operation on Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:Bots.

Software that runs automated tasks over the Internet

An Internet bot, web robot, robot or simply bot, is a software application that runs automated tasks (scripts) over the Internet.[1] Typically, bots perform tasks that are simple and repetitive much faster than a person could. The most extensive use of bots is for web crawling, in which an automated script fetches, analyzes and files information from web servers. More than half of all web traffic is generated by bots.[2]

Efforts by web servers to restrict bots vary. Some servers have a file that contains the rules governing bot behavior on that server. Any bot that does not follow the rules could, in theory, be denied access to or removed from, the affected website. If the posted text file has no associated program/software/app, then adhering to the rules is entirely voluntary. There would be no way to enforce the rules or to ensure that a bot's creator or implementer reads or acknowledges the robots.txt file. Some bots are "good" – e.g. search engine spiders – while others are used to launch malicious attacks on, for example, political campaigns.[2]

IM and IRC[edit]

Some bots communicate with users of Internet-based services, via instant messaging (IM), Internet Relay Chat (IRC), or other web interfaces such as Facebook bots and Twitter bots. These chatbots may allow people to ask questions in plain English and then formulate a response. Such bots can often handle reporting weather, zip code information, sports scores, currency or other unit conversions, etc.[citation needed] Others are used for entertainment, such as SmarterChild on AOL Instant Messenger and MSN Messenger.

Bots are very commonly used on social media. A user may not be aware that they are interacting with a bot.

Additional roles of an IRC bot may be to listen on a conversation channel, and to comment on certain phrases uttered by the participants (based on pattern matching). This is sometimes used as a help service for new users or to censor profanity.

Social bots[edit]

Main article: Social bot

Social networking bots are sets of algorithms that take on the duties of repetitive sets of instructions in order to establish a service or connection among social networking users. Among the various designs of networking bots, the most common are chat bots, algorithms designed to converse with a human user, and social bots, algorithms designed to mimic human behaviors to converse with patterns similar to those of a human user. The history of social botting can be traced back to Alan Turing in the 1950s and his vision of designing sets of instructional code approved by the Turing test. In the 1960s Joseph Weizenbaum created ELIZA, a natural language processing computer program. considered an early indicator of artificial intelligence algorithms. ELIZA inspired computer programmers to design tasked programs that can match behavior patterns to their sets of instruction. As a result, natural language processing has become an influencing factor to the development of artificial intelligence and social bots. And as information and thought see a progressive mass spreading on social media websites,[3] innovative technological advancements are made following the same pattern.

Reports of political interferences in recent elections, including the 2016 US and 2017 UK general elections,[4] have set the notion of bots being more prevalent because of the ethics that is challenged between the bot's design and the bot's designer. Emilio Ferrara, a computer scientist from the University of Southern California reporting on Communications of the ACM,[5] said the lack of resources available to implement fact-checking and information verification results in the large volumes of false reports and claims made about these bots on social media platforms. In the case of Twitter, most of these bots are programmed with search filter capabilities that target keywords and phrases favoring political agendas and then retweet them. While the attention of bots is programmed to spread unverified information throughout the social media platforms,[6] it is a challenge that programmers face in the wake of a hostile political climate. The Bot Effect is what Ferrera reported as the socialization of bots and human users creating a vulnerability to the leaking of personal information and polarizing influences outside the ethics of the bot's code, and was confirmed by Guillory Kramer in his study where he observed the behavior of emotionally volatile users and the impact the bots have on them, altering their perception of reality.

Commercial bots[edit]

There has been a great deal of controversy about the use of bots in an automated trading function. Auction website eBay took legal action in an attempt to suppress a third-party company from using bots to look for bargains on its site; this approach backfired on eBay and attracted the attention of further bots. The United Kingdom-based bet exchange, Betfair, saw such a large amount of traffic coming from bots that it launched a WebService API aimed at bot programmers, through which it can actively manage bot interactions.

Bot farms are known to be used in online app stores, like the Apple App Store and Google Play, to manipulate positions[7] or increase positive ratings/reviews.[8]

A rapidly growing, benign form of internet bot is the chatbot. From 2016, when Facebook Messenger allowed developers to place chatbots on their platform, there has been an exponential growth of their use on that app alone. 30,000 bots were created for Messenger in the first six months, rising to 100,000 by September 2017.[9] Avi Ben Ezra, CTO of SnatchBot, told Forbes that evidence from the use of their chatbot building platform pointed to a near future saving of millions of hours of human labor as 'live chat' on websites was replaced with bots.[10]

Companies use internet bots to increase online engagement and streamline communication. Companies often use bots to cut down on cost; instead of employing people to communicate with consumers, companies have developed new ways to be efficient. These chatbots are used to answer customers' questions: for example, Domino's developed a chatbot that can take orders via Facebook Messenger. Chatbots allow companies to allocate their employees' time to other tasks.[11]

Malicious bots[edit]

One example of the malicious use of bots is the coordination and operation of an automated attack on networked computers, such as a denial-of-service attack by a botnet. Internet bots or web bots can also be used to commit click fraud and more recently have appeared around MMORPG games as computer game bots. Another category is represented by spambots, internet bots that attempt to spam large amounts of content on the Internet, usually adding advertising links. More than 94.2% of websites have experienced a bot attack.[2]

There are malicious bots (and botnets) of the following types:

  1. Spambots that harvest email addresses from contact or guestbook pages
  2. Downloaded programs that suck bandwidth by downloading entire websites
  3. Website scrapers that grab the content of websites and re-use it without permission on automatically generated doorway pages
  4. Registration bots that sign up a specific email address to numerous services in order to have the confirmation messages flood the email inbox and distract from important messages indicating a security breach.[12]
  5. Viruses and worms
  6. DDoS attacks
  7. Botnets, zombie computers, etc.
  8. Spambots that try to redirect people onto a malicious website, sometimes found in comment sections or forums of various websites
  9. Viewbots create fake views[13][14]
  10. Bots that buy up higher-demand seats for concerts, particularly by ticket brokers who resell the tickets.[15] These bots run through the purchase process of entertainment event-ticketing sites and obtain better seats by pulling as many seats back as it can.
  11. Bots that are used in massively multiplayer online role-playing games to farm for resources that would otherwise take significant time or effort to obtain, which can be a concern for online in-game economies.[citation needed]
  12. Bots that increase views for YouTube videos
  13. Bots that increase traffic counts on analytics reporting to extract money from advertisers. A study by Comscore found that over half of ads shown across thousands of campaigns between May 2012 and February 2013 were not served to human users.[16]
  14. Bots used on internet forums to automatically post inflammatory or nonsensical posts to disrupt the forum and anger users.

in 2012, journalist Percy von Lipinski reported that he discovered millions of bots or botted or pinged views at CNNiReport. CNN iReport quietly removed millions of views from the account of iReporter Chris Morrow.[17] It is not known if the ad revenue received by CNN from the fake views was ever returned to the advertisers.

The most widely used anti-bot technique is the use of . Examples of providers include , Minteye, Solve Media and . circumvented

Human interaction with social bots[edit]

There are two main concerns with bots: clarity and face-to-face support. The cultural background of human beings affects the way they communicate with social bots. Many people believe that bots are vastly less intelligent than humans and so they are not worthy of our respect.[1]

Min-Sun Kim proposed five concerns or issues that may arise when communicating with a social robot, and they are avoiding the damage of peoples' feelings, minimizing impositions, disproval from others, clarity issues, and how effective their messages may come across.[1]

Social robots also take away from the genuine creations of human relationships.[1]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ abcdDunham, Ken; Melnick, Jim (2009). Malicious Bots: An outside look of the Internet. CRC Press. ISBN .
  2. ^ abcZeifman, Igal. "Bot Traffic Report 2016". Incapsula. Retrieved 1 February 2017.
  3. ^"Twitter Followers Guide". 20 November 2019
  4. ^Howard, Philip N (18 October 2018). "How Political Campaigns Weaponize Social Media Bots". IEEE Spectrum.
  5. ^Ferrara, Emilio; Varol, Onur; Davis, Clayton; Menczer, Filippo; Flammini, Alessandro (2016). "The Rise of Social Bots". Communications of the ACM. 59 (7): 96–104. arXiv:1407.5225. doi:10.1145/2818717. S2CID 1914124.
  6. ^Alessandro, Bessi; Emilio, Ferrara (2016-11-07). "Social Bots Distort the 2016 US Presidential Election Online Discussion". SSRN 2982233.
  7. ^"Touch Arcade Forum Discussion on fraud in the Top 25 Free Ranking".
  8. ^"App Store fake reviews: Here's how they encourage your favourite developers to cheat". Electricpig. Archived from the original on 2017-10-18. Retrieved 2014-06-11.
  9. ^"Facebook Messenger Hits 100,000 bots". 2017-04-18. Retrieved 2017-09-22.
  10. ^Murray Newlands. "These Chatbot Usage Metrics Will Change Your Customer Service Strategy". Retrieved 2018-03-08.
  11. ^"How companies are using chatbots for marketing: Use cases and inspiration - MarTech Today". MarTech Today. 2018-01-22. Retrieved 2018-04-10.
  12. ^Dima Bekerman: How Registration Bots Concealed the Hacking of My Amazon Account, Application Security, Industry Perspective, December 1st, 2016, In:
  13. ^Carr, Sam (July 15, 2019). "What Is Viewbotting: How Twitch Are Taking On The Ad Fraudsters". PPC Protect. Retrieved 19 September 2020.
  14. ^Lewis, Richard (March 17, 2015). "Leading StarCraft streamer embroiled in viewbot controversy". Dot Esports. Retrieved 19 September 2020.
  15. ^Safruti, Ido (June 19, 2017). "Why Detecting Bot Attacks Is Becoming More Difficult". DARKReading.
  16. ^Holiday, Ryan (January 16, 2014). "Fake Traffic Means Real Paydays". BetaBeat. Archived from the original on 2015-01-03. Retrieved 2014-04-28.
  17. ^von Lipinski, Percy (28 May 2013). "CNN's iReport hit hard by pay-per-view scandal". PulsePoint. Archived from the original on 18 August 2016. Retrieved 21 July 2016.

External links[edit]

  • Media related to Bots at Wikimedia Commons


Automated programs on Wikipedia

"WP:B" redirects here. For other uses, see Wikipedia:Bureaucrats, Wikipedia:Blocking policy, Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy, Wikipedia:Be bold, Wikipedia:Backlog, and Wikipedia:Content assessment/B-Class criteria.

"WP:BOT" redirects here. For other uses, see Wikipedia:Bot policy, WikiProject British Overseas Territories, and Wikipedia:Wikimedia Foundation § Board of Trustees.

Wikipedia information page

This page in a nutshell: On Wikipedia, bots are computer-controlled user accounts performing various tasks in order to maintain the encyclopedia. Bots are used for many purposes, for instance removing obvious vandalism and archiving talk pages. All bots must be approved by a special group before they are put into use.
A man is shaking hands with a bot

A bot (a common nickname for software robot) is an automated tool that carries out repetitive and mundane tasks to maintain the 54,437,813 pages of the English Wikipedia. Bots are able to make edits very rapidly, but can disrupt Wikipedia if they are incorrectly designed or operated. For these reasons, a bot policy has been developed.

There are currently 2,531 bot tasks approved for use on the English Wikipedia; however, not all approved tasks involve actively carrying out edits. Bots will leave messages on user talk pages if the action that the bot has carried out is of interest to that editor. Some bots can be excluded from leaving these messages by using the {{bots}} tags. There are 198 exclusion-compliant bots, which are listed in this category. There are 321 bots flagged with the "bot" flag right now (and over 400 former bots). There is also a range of tools that allow semi-automated editing of large numbers of articles.


Main page: Wikipedia:History of Wikipedia bots

Bots have been used in the past to create large numbers of articles that were uploaded to Wikipedia within a short timeframe. Some technical problems were experienced and this led to the formulation of a bot policy, as well as a restriction on the automated, large-scale, creation of articles.

Bot policy

Main page: Wikipedia:Bot policy

Wikipedia policy requires that bots be harmless and useful, have approval, use separate user accounts, and be operated responsibly.

Bot Approvals Group

Main page: Wikipedia:Bot Approvals Group

The Bot Approvals Group (BAG) supervises and approves all bot-related activity from a technical and quality-control perspective on behalf of the English Wikipedia community. On the English Wikipedia, the right to flag a bot is limited to bureaucrats.

Running an automated bot on a separate account requires approval, which may be requested at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval.

How to create a bot

Main page: Help:Creating a bot

Some programming experience generally is needed to create a bot, and knowledge of regular expressions is useful for many editing tasks. However, some of the more user-friendly tools, such as AutoWikiBrowser or JavaScript Wiki Browser, can be used for some tasks.

The Chicken Scheme, Common Lisp, Haskell, Java, Microsoft .NET, Perl, PHP, Python, and Ruby programming languages all have libraries available for creating bots. Pywikibot is a commonly used Python package developed specifically for creating MediaWiki bots.

Dealing with bot issues

Main page: Wikipedia:Bot policy § Dealing with issues

If you have noticed a problem with a bot, have a complaint, or have a suggestion to make, you should contact the bot operator directly via their user talk page (or via the bot account's talk page). Bot operators are expected to be responsive to the community's concerns and suggestions, but please assume good faith and don't panic. Bugs and mistakes happen, and we're all here to build an encyclopedia.

If the bot is causing a significant problem, or the bot operator has not responded and the bot is still causing issues, several mechanisms are available to prevent further disruption. Many bots provide a stop button or means to disable the problematic task on their bot user page. This should be tried first, followed by a discussion of the issue with the bot operator. If no such mechanism is available (or if urgent action is needed), leave a message at the administrators' noticeboard requesting a block for a malfunctioning bot. Per the noticeboard's guideline, you are required to notify the bot operator of the discussion taking place at the noticeboard.

If you are concerned that a bot is operating outside the established consensus for its task, discuss the issue with the bot operator first, or try other forms of dispute resolution (BAG members can act as neutral mediators on such matters). If you are concerned that a bot no longer has consensus for its task, you may formally appeal or ask for re-examination of a bot's approval.

How to hide a specific bot from your watchlist


While it is easy to hide all bots from your watchlist, there is no way of hiding specific bots through user preferences or default watchlist settings. However, it is possible with a user script by following these simple steps.

Main steps

  1. Go to your Special:MyPage/common.js page (or your Special:MyPage/skin.js), and add the following line (diff):
  2. Remember to bypass your browser's cache.
  3. Go to your watchlist. There should be a box with several options. Tick the 'Enable hide user buttons' box. This will let you hide specific bots (and users) from your watchlist.
    Note: You might want to untick the 'Enable hide user buttons' box after you ignore a bot to ensure that you don't accidentally click 'hide user' when browsing your watchlist.

Optional steps

  1. If you find the 'Enable hide user buttons' box annoying, go to your Special:MyPage/common.css page (or Special:MyPage/skin.css) and add the following line (diff):
  2. Remember to bypass your browser's cache.
  3. If you want to show the box again, for example to reset your ignore list, go to your Special:MyPage/common.css page and remove the line you added in optional step #1 (remembering to again bypass your browser's cache). Redoing optional steps #1 and #2 will hide the box again.

While you are completely free to ignore any bots (or users) you want, it is a good idea to only ignore bots with well-defined tasks, which you trust to not make any mistakes.

How to hide AWB edits from your watchlist


There is no way of hiding AutoWikiBrowser (AWB) edits through user preferences or default watchlist settings. However, it is possible with a user script by following these steps:


  1. Go to your Special:MyPage/common.js page (or your Special:MyPage/skin.js), and add the following two lines (diff):
    importScript('User:Evad37/Watchlist-hideAWB.js');// Backlink: [[User:Evad37/Watchlist-hideAWB]]varawbHiddenByDefault=true;
  2. Bypass your browser's cache.

Any edit with "AWB" in its edit summary will now default to hidden for you. You may reveal them by clicking on the "show AWB" tab at the top of your watchlist (next to "Special page" for Monobook skin, or in the "More" dropdown for Vector skin).


  • If you leave out , AWB edits will be shown by default, but you will have the option of hiding AWB edits by clicking on the "hide AWB" tab at the top of your watchlist.
  • While you are completely free to ignore AWB edits, remember that many of them will contain substantial changes from human editors, not just minor edits from bots or meatbots.
  • When hiding edits with a script, earlier edits can be forced to appear. Using the preference option is necessary to see other non-hidden watchlist hits for a page.

How to stop specific bots from editing the article

Main page: Template:Bots

It's rare that a mainspace article needs to not be edited by a specific bot. No article needs to stop all bots from editing, since antivandal bots such as ClueBot NG need to be able to edit all mainspace articles. The template {{bots}} can stop a bot from editing an article under the rare circumstance it's needed.


Some examples of bots are:

See also





Userbox and top icon


Bots wiki the

Meet the 'bots' that edit Wikipedia

By Daniel Nasaw
BBC News Magazine, Washington

Wikipedia is written and maintained by tens of thousands of volunteers across the world. Those, in turn, are assisted by hundreds of "bots" - autonomous computer programmes that keep the encyclopaedia running.

"Penis is the male sex organ," the Wikipedia page in question read.

While that statement is undeniably true and thus may merit inclusion in Wikipedia, it belongs nowhere in the site's article on national supreme courts and their legal roles.

When an anonymous Wikipedia reader in South Carolina offered that contribution to the globally popular online encyclopaedia last week, it took just seconds for the blemish to be discovered and deleted.

The vandalism was caught not by a reader, but by a simple artificial intelligence programme called a bot - short for robot.

ClueBot NG, as the bot is known, resides on a computer from which it sallies forth into the vast encyclopaedia to detect and clean up vandalism almost as soon as it occurs.

It is one of several hundred bots patrolling Wikipedia at any given time. Its role in repairing the Supreme Court article illustrates how bots have quietly become an indispensable - if virtually invisible - part of the Wikipedia project.

"Wikipedia would be a shambles without bots," a Wikipedia administrator known on the site as Hersfold writes in an email.

English Wikipedia alone surpassed four million articles this month. It contains an estimated 2.5 billion words, equivalent to millions of pages, and it is 50 times larger than the Encyclopaedia Britannica.

Wikipedia is maintained across all languages by tens of thousands of editors - about 77,000 of whom make more than five edits a month.

But the project is so vast, and its maintenance so labour-intensive that it defies the capability of its human administrators and editors to keep it in order.

That is where the bots come in.

"We had a joke that one day all the bots should go on strike just to make everyone appreciate how much work they do," says Chris Grant, a 19-year-old student in Perth, Australia who is on the Wikipedia committee that supervises the bots.

"The site would demand much more work from all of us and the editor burnout rate would be much higher."

The bots perform a wide range of editorial and administrative tasks that are tedious, repetitive and time-consuming but vital.

They delete vandalism and foul language, organise and catalogue entries, and handle the reams of behind-the-scenes work that keep the encyclopaedia running smoothly and efficiently and keep its appearance neat and uniform in style.

In brick-and-mortar library terms, bots are akin to the students who shelve books, move stacks from one range to another, affix bar codes to book spines and perform other grunt tasks that allow the trained librarians to concentrate on acquisitions and policy.

"Wikipedia has just grown so much that I don't know how well people would handle it if all the bots went away," says Brad Jorsch, a computer programmer in North Carolina who runs a bot that tracks the tags reminding editors to add citations to articles.

Bots have been around almost as long as Wikipedia itself.

The site was founded in 2001, and the next year, one called rambot created about 30,000 articles - at a rate of thousands per day - on individual towns in the US.

The bot pulled data directly out of US Census tables. The articles read as if they had been written by a robot. They were short and formulaic and contained little more than strings of demographic statistics.

But once they had been created, human editors took over and filled out the entries with historical details, local governance information, and tourist attractions.

In 2008, another bot created thousands of tiny articles about asteroids, pulling a few items of data for each one from an online Nasa database.

Today, the Wikipedia community remains divided on the value of bot-written entries. Some administrators say a stub of an article listing only a few points of data is of little value; others say any new content is good.

The upshot of the disagreement is bots are no longer permitted to write whole articles. But their ability to perform rote maintenance frees up human editors to do research and write entries and check one another's work to ensure accuracy.

"I don't think people realise how much maintenance and meta work goes on in Wikipedia," says Grant.

Some administrators fear a renegade bot will one day inflict catastrophic damage on the encyclopaedia. Think Skynet in the Terminator films.

Those fears are unfounded, says Grant.

For one, a bot is not like an automobile - if a part fails while in operation it will shut down rather than careen into something.

"You'd have to have someone actually have someone programme the bot to go crazy and delete everything," Grant says.

Bots with the rights to delete pages, block editors and take other drastic actions could only be run by editors already entrusted with administrative privileges, Grant says.

The bots do make mistakes, however, if they encounter a new circumstance their programming cannot account for. ClueBot NG, the anti-vandalism bot, has a small rate of false positives - edits it mistakes for vandalism, but which are in fact legitimate.

Since Wikipedia closely tracks edits, however, mistakes can be repaired almost as quickly as they happened, administrators say.

Human writers need not fear they will one day be replaced by bots, the bot masters say.

"It takes human judgement to write an article or proof an article or even clean up grammar and spelling," says Jorsch.

ULTIMATE ROBLOX PIGGY SONG! (Official LankyBox Music Video)

So what exactly is a “bot”?¶

Well, it really depends on who you ask:

An Internet bot, also known as web robot, WWW robot or simply bot, is a software application that runs automated tasks over the Internet. Typically, bots perform tasks that are both simple and structurally repetitive, at a much higher rate than would be possible for a human alone.

— Wikipedia

Congress edits Wikipedia

Bunch of Twitter usernames that are not controlled by people, but are just robots that are programmed to release the information related to all these different things. And that’s really interesting.

— A user experience tester

In essence, an online bot is a program (sometimes simple, sometimes more complex) that does something a human would otherwise do, like post pictures on Tumblr or retweet Tweets about cats.

Apparently botmaking attracts a lot of academics, artists, and terrifyingly creative people. WHO KNEW.

— emma winston ☄ (@deer_ful) February 3, 2016

Browse by category¶

told my mom about the twitter bot i made

— puppet ivermectin shits (@screampuppets) September 14, 2021

Browse by network¶

bots are always there in dark times

— Sarah Davis Baker 🏳️‍🌈 (@sdavbaker) November 2, 2016

You will also like:

I would simply disagree with someone else, and if I had nothing, then he too. Yes. you have done a lot. he shook his head. This is at least better than what everyone else is doing.

1720 1721 1722 1723 1724